This warranty is not transferable.Įxample of a USED items description ( Note where the Bold and Bullet List buttons are). There is no express or implied warranty beyond what is stated. This warranty does not cover intentional or accidental handling, abuse or neglect. In some situations we may choose to refund the purchase price of the item. We will repair or replace the equipment at our discretion. If your equipment fails due to normal use, please contact our customer support department so that we can assist you. All used items sales are final unless found to be defective or stated to be a sold AS-IS item. The photos are of the actual item for sale. This is a used item and includes everything that is photographed in this listing and nothing more. F1.4 made it big that they wouldn't fit OSS.***Used*** Sigma ART 30mm f/1.4 for Nikon Lens I would buy this lens, if sigma made it f/1.8 with OSS and similar size, while sharper and cheaper than Sony. With sigma 1/50 1/60 is your minimum speed you can handheld with a lot of risk. Sony will give a better picture when:ġ/15 f/1.8 vs. Because it's possible to take a sharper picture with Sony in low light handheld. Sony lens deserves to be mentioned better about these 2 points. I carry around my a6300 because it's small. So, Sony 35mm managed to fit OSS in a smaller package than sigma (f/1.8 respectingly) makes a great deal of difference for us. On my a7rii I wouldn't ever place neither of these two anyway for different reasons. This is Apsc lens, and Sony does not provide in body stabilization for its Apsc line. However, I read it entirely, and DPreview should have been a little more fair here. The Sigma also shows more of a 'cat's eye' effect where the bokeh changes from a round shape to more of an ellipse: which can translate to a 'swirl' in the bokeh pattern, but in our experience doesn't produce any distracting patterns during use. This smoother shape helps contribute to smooth bokeh in the real-world, with little in the way of fussiness as detail drops out of the focus plane. We can also see the Sigma produces a rounder 'bokeh ball' wide-open, with the Sony producing a bit of a jagged edge. In terms of bokeh, switching the overall view between Sigma and the Sony shows the added amount of background blur the extra 2/3 stop allows the Sigma to produce (the slightly closer focus distance shouldn't make an appreciable difference). Although, as the DxO results suggest, the Sigma starts to show a bit more lateral CA when stopped down. By F4 much of the Sigmas axial CA has gone away, while the Sony still shows a little bit of fringing near the focus plane. The Sony shows quite a bit of aberrations outside the focus plane, while the Sigma exudes much less in the same area. Wide-open, we see the difference in LoCA between the two. This tends to be most prevalent on fast primes and it difficult to remove so you want as little LoCA as possible if you're hoping to shoot wide-open.īoth lenses were shot from different distances to keep magnification constant and focus is locked at the center target for the whole run (meaning that any focus shift effect should become visible upon stopping down). Here we're looking at longitudinal (axial) chromatic aberration (LoCA), which appears as green and magenta fringing on either side of the plane of focus. Honestly, out of all the lenses I’ve used, I find this lens to fit the camera the best. Buy a Used Sigma 30mm F/1.4 DC DN Lens for Sony E mount -Perfect condition like new as photos -Comes as photos -this is an actual photos of product. Combining this lens with my Sony a6000 (with just a wrist strap) makes for an extremely small and portable kit. Move over to the backlit trees on the right, and we can see axial CA improve when stopped down, with the edges of the trees losing most of their purple edges, although a little bit of CA still remains in the extremes when stopped down to F5.6. The Sigma 30mm F1.4 certainly met that criteria, weighing a reasonable 9.03oz (226g) and measuring a length of 2.9 inches (7.3cm). By F5.6 the Sony has improved, but the Sigma still remains ahead.Ī look at the Sigma against itself both wide-open and at F5.6 shows how sharpness and vignetting improves at the extremes when stopping down. At the extremes the Sigma isn't perfect, but does stay ahead of its competitor.Īt F2 the Sigma is way ahead of the Sony in the center and exudes less purple fringing. As we move away from the center sharpness quickly drops off on the Sony. Center sharpness on the Sigma is ahead of the Sony. A bit of lateral CA (even with built-in corrections applied) comes through on both images when wide-open, but overall the Sigma has sharper details. Looking at the scene, we can see the DxO results materialize in the real-world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |